Category Archives: CricInfo

A Tough Question For Graeme Smith

Over at CRIC-SIS, Shridhar Jaju highlights a particularly tough question at Graeme Smith’s post-match press conference. (See below at 2:18):

As a former reporter, I know the tightrope that must be walked when asking sources difficult questions. On the one hand, these types of queries usually yield the best (i.e., the most interesting) answers. They challenge personalities and fulfill a basic responsibility of journalism (i.e., ask the question that the public wants answered). On the other hand, there’s no reason to be rude. It’s clear from the video that the reporter’s first language isn’t English, and perhaps he thought his joke (“Instead of chokers, you should be called jokers”) would lighten his tone, but humor rarely works in such situations. In this case, it clearly didn’t ;Smith just says, “I think I’ve got your question” to cut the reporter off.

There’s a broader issue: what is the point of post-match press conferences? I’m not a sports writer, and quite frankly, I don’t read much sports journalism (other than Cricinfo) but it seems the best writing I come across relies the least on these events. Their only use is to fulfill the requirement that articles record responses of a player — but if the player doesn’t have any insights, why does that merit precious column  space? Maybe I’m being too dismissive; perhaps reporters just need to ask more useful questions, like what players were feeling and thinking at particular moments in the match (E.g., Yuvraj, did you plan that magnificent Brett Lee over, or was it spontaneous?). This is the difference between asking, “What is your typical day like?” and “What did you do yesterday?”

And, really, what rational person can explain what happened to South Africa? Who can explain the intangible effect pressure has on good players, so that against, say, Bangladesh, their risks and talents turn in their favor, whereas against New Zealand (in a quarterfinal), they don’t? That’s why I like the first question from this press conference: Graeme, can you tell us how you feel? The answer isn’t that great, but when Smith’s face falls briefly into his hands, you understand.

James Madison Has Something To Teach Pakistan’s Cricket Team

Cricinfo has this little tidbit about the Pakistani World Cup captaincy imbroglio:

Former Pakistan captain Inzamam-ul-Haq has said the delay in naming the captain of the World Cup squad has led to the creation of factions within the national side.

That’s funny. I’m of the faction that believes that if a Pakistani national cricket team exists, captain or not captain, it will have factions. Q.E.D., really. There’s a certain irony in Inzamam’s comments – when selectors have chosen a captain (Akram, Waqar, Yousuf, Younis, Malik), players have continued to fight.  This time, they decide not to pick a leader…and, voila! Factions.

This brings to mind Poli Sci 101 in college, specifically Federalist Paper No. 10 by James Madison. Main argument: factions always exist, because of the nature of man. You can’t root them out without rooting out liberty, so deal with their effects by “extending the sphere.” That is, if a faction takes hold in a hamlet, it doesn’t matter because it won’t spill into the county, or the state, or the republic at large.

Of course, Madison also says small democracies are particularly prone to the evils of factionalism. And there aren’t many towns smaller than the 11 members of a cricket squad…

Parthiv Patel To Replace Whom?

Cricinfo has a hilarious sub-headline up on its website right now: “INJURED TENDULKAR TO RETURN HOME/Parthiv Patel named replacement for rest of series.”

So this is what it’s come down to, after a decade of head-scratching and angst. The greatest batsman of his generation will be replaced by…Parthiv Patel. Just a preview of things to come once the Big Three start to retire, folks.

Watching Cricket Players Arrive In An Airport

I like it when cricket media outlets devote space to announce the arrival of such-and-such team at an airport. I also like the accompanying photos, showing dapper young athletes dressed in their Sunday best. Reminds me of my high school days, when we had to dress up to go to tournaments with other schools.

But this is just a cricket thing, right? It seems so strange — I almost never hear of such coverage in American sports (the Yankees arrived in Boston tonight?). And why can’t these poor athletes wear something less stuffy than a tie and suit off the plane?

Ijaz Butt Peddles His Unconscious

The seriously strange thing about Ijaz Butt’s outburst to Cricinfo — the thing that most captures just how unbelievably unhinged this man may be — comes in this small detail in the story:

In a prepared statement read out to ESPNcricinfo…

“This is not a conspiracy to defraud bookies but a conspiracy to defraud Pakistan and Pakistan cricket,” Butt said. “We have taken it in hand to start our own investigations. We will shortly reveal the names of the people, the parties and the bodies involved in this sinister conspiracy and we also reserve the right to sue them for damages.

Someone in the PCB actually put pen to paper and wrote these incredibly daft thoughts for public consumption. Granted, the craziest part of the exchange — when Butt accuses the English of throwing the third ODI for money (because not even the Pakistanis’ own chairman believe the team can win legitimately) — is improvised, but the whole bizarre episode is a little gem of insanity. I increasingly understand why Pakistan cricket is what it is.

The Terrible Bargain Of Watching Cricketers In The Modern World

This post is meant to accompany my previous one, pleading with the BCCI to give the Indian cricket team a break. That sounds a bit soft, so I wanted to explain a bit more. Over the weekend, I read Robin Uthappa’s interview with Cricinfo about his plans for the future, as well as his recent shoulder surgery. We hear about injuries to cricketers all the time, but rarely in such terrible, explicit and disturbing detail:

He said the first ten days post-surgery were most painful. “Surgery in itself was a difficult one for me. I never had a fracture, I never wore a cast, I never had stitches, never been on general anaesthesia, never had a nerve block, and now I had all of it in one day,” Uthappa told Bangalore Mirror. “I had a cast right up to my forearm, a sling. I never ever experienced such excruciating pain in my life. I was on narcotics for 20 days, sitting and slouching on bed, passing out almost all the time, and then you lose shape.”

Read that one more time, and think about the terrible bargain we make with modern athletes. We crave entertainment and suspense and drama from their actions and in return, we offer them money, endorsements, celebrity and fame (and, more than likely, our scorn). For the span of their career, we let them in our homes and, because cricket is such a time-consuming affair, we grow to know them almost intimately — the perpetual close-ups, their expressions, every bit of their actions and technique.

But is this a fair bargain? Cricket isn’t nearly as bad as some other sports; here in America, it’s not unusual for athletes in baseball and American football and basketball to earn simply gross salaries, which easily dwarf even the amounts offered in the IPL. Then again, cricket is demanding in other ways — players can play for a decade (or more) if they try hard enough; they have to tour other countries for months and bowlers have to contort their bodies in an ungodly fashion for their deliveries.

Of course, you say (as everyone else does), that you’d give your left arm to play for the Indian national cricket team, and to earn the money they do. Fair enough, but think about the ethical relationship you have then built around the game. You command the players to dance for you, while you throw them your scraps, and when they tire and suffer and bleed, you move on to the next. This is just another price of cricket becoming normal, that is, like any other modern sport, where spectators — people who may go to a Test match simply to doze, or experience life — become consumers. This is the ultimate price brought forth by Lalit Modi and the T20 regime — more applause, more money, more games, more television, more gimmicks. And more pain.

Gideon Haigh Is Kicking Ass And Taking Names

I’m trying not to link to stories on Cricinfo, since everybody reads the site already (and no doubt compulsively refreshes the page through the day). But Gideon Haigh’s pox-on-all-houses hit job the other day deserves a hyperlink and much more (awards! Pledges to reform! Parades! Insurgent candidacies! Sappy montages, etc.). A small excerpt:

In India, this situation has further entrenched itself in the 21st century because so many chief ministers or their proxies now run state associations, coveting membership of the BCCI, not out of an abiding commitment to cricket’s betterment but as a political credential: step forward some plump prize butterball turkeys in Sharad Pawar, Arun Jaitley, Farooq Abdullah, Narendra Modi and Laloo Prasad Yadav, to name but a few. Not that there isn’t something to be said for having a can-do politician in one’s corner, but it’s also an admission of a lack of faith in the fairness and efficiency of bureaucratic processes. And is this what India would wish to be known for?

Hearing The Results On The Radio

Samir Chopra and I have been writing about the joys of following the game without exactly following it (that is, with a delay — waiting for the next day’s newspaper or e-scorecard on Cricinfo). In the early days of this blog, I wrote about the zen art of ‘watching’ cricket through a live scorecard. I also  posted this radio memory as a comment on Chopra’s website, but I thought I’d share it here as well:

I only have one memory with cricket-on-the-radio, but it’s a good one. I was still a middle schooler in Bombay in the mid-1990s, and since I was stuck in class, I couldn’t follow the match between India and South Africa at Eden Gardens.

All the students in the class — and in those days, there were 40 stuck in one room — wanted the latest updates, but only one had the foresight (and courage) to smuggle in a small radio. In between classes, when we waited for teachers to arrive and start teaching the next subject, we’d crowd around the radio and hear the  faraway stadium in Calcutta burst with applause.

“Azhar’s gone crazy,” one student shouted. “Another 4!” (He went to hit a century off 72 balls.) That’s how the day unfolded: impatiently waiting for one teacher to finish his lesson (but never daring to appear bored, because the discipline could be harsh), and then trying to conjure the images we heard on the radio in our head — Azhar, making us proud.

Waking Up To The Result On The East Coast

Samir Chopra adds the Eastern Standard Time to his list of woes about this side of the States (as well as the downright awful weather we’ve been having, I imagine?). Like him, I missed the dramatic post-Tea session on Day 1, when the South Africans lost their mind.

I wish I had seen it live — though the highlights on cricket-online.tv are excellent — but I also like waking up in the morning, scrambling over to the computer the first chance I get and firing up the Cricinfo scorecard to see what I missed. It’s a moment of absolute dread and excitement. This morning, for instance, I went to bed with India at 120/2 — seven hours later, they could have either collapsed in a heap or pummeled the South Africans into submission (as it turned out, they did a bit of both).

Reminds me of the times I went on vacation in other parts of India with the family, and without a television nearby, I’d beg my father to buy me a newspaper so I could read what happened on the tour. It’s not the greatest way to follow the game, but it has its perks too, Samir.

The Luckiest Indian: W.P. Saha

Who the hell is Wriddhiman Saha? And how did he end up on our television (OK, computer) screens? Let’s recap the wonderfully insane story:

A Bangladesh bouncer hit Rahul Dravid in the jaw. Yuvraj Singh suffered a “ligament tear on his left wrist.” V.V.S. Laxman injured his finger while fielding against the Bangladeshis. Rohit Sharma, called up to play for the injured Laxman, was injured during morning practice (no doubt by some cosmic devil).

And so we have: W.P. Saha, perhaps the only person the Indians could find on short-notice hanging about in Nagpur. Add to this the fact that the South Africans won the toss, and it looks like a long five days ahead for us.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 748 other followers