The difficulties come in calculating what correlates to a win: runs per resource used (can use D/L for this), runs against per resource taken for bowlers gives you a comparable value for batsmen and bowlers. You need some way of adjusting that for fielding value (fielding resource taken/runs saved/lost compared to an average fielder), which is not currently measured (maybe the teams do measure it), and is probably under-rated. Then there is assist value: the player who gives a faster scorer the strike is worth more than one who score a little faster but doesn’t; opponent match-ups, the batsman/bowler who opposes the best player hurts their own output but might still be the best option; and the complications of a chase: risk-free batting and wicket-taking is worth more in a small chase than a large one.

Then you need to compare to incomes, which is complicated by the fact that a player who gets you 0.2 wins per game is not worth the same as 2 players who get 0.1 wins per game. The latter are average and easy to find, the former is a star. Market value is not linear with wins per dollar, but exponential and goes up rapidly as a player becomes rarer.

Interesting question. Have though about it before. But unfortunately I’m busy too…